EcosystemSUMMIT & RESEARCH
Evidence library / The Reality of AI: Adoption, Capacity, and Change Management
AI for development · SELECTED MOMENT · 1:24

CARE argues that ethical collection still wastes participants’ time without capacity to act on insights.

Likely speaker
Mala RamDigital Technology Programmes Specialist · GOAL Global
Emily JanochAssociate Vice President for Evidence and Learning · CARELinkedIn ↗
Unidentified speaker

Free short preview · Nobody asks for more apps

Speaker turns in this passage

Select a time to jump to that part of the passage. Speaker changes are approximate.

Mala RamDigital Technology Programmes Specialist · GOAL Global
Unidentified speaker
Emily JanochAssociate Vice President for Evidence and Learning · CARELinkedIn ↗

CARE argues that ethical collection still wastes participants’ time without capacity to act on insights.

View citation

Attributed contributors: Mala Ram; Emily Janoch. “CARE argues that ethical collection still wastes participants’ time without capacity to act on insights..” The Reality of AI: Adoption, Capacity, and Change Management. ECOSYSTEM Summit, Barcelona, 16 September 2026. Session time 37:20–38:45. https://cs-ecosystem.commonshare.workers.dev/evidence/E-76f7fae4f690

Interpretation and context.

Analyst synthesis. The recording establishes that a claim was made. It does not independently establish the claimed effect.

mechanism argument

CARE argues that ethical collection still wastes participants’ time without capacity to act on insights.

Contributors
Mala RamDigital Technology Programmes Specialist · GOAL Global
Emily JanochAssociate Vice President for Evidence and Learning · CARELinkedIn ↗
Unidentified speaker

Proposed mechanism: Connect analysis to an actionable response and participant-defined benefit.

Limit: India tax-enforcement illustration is not independently checked.

capacityaccountabilityagency

Where it connects.

Better information changes outcomes only through people and institutions able and willing to act.

The event repeatedly names a missing step between producing an answer and changing a decision. Evidence may reveal conflicting priorities without resolving them.

Follow the evidence →