1:01Draw the decision before choosing the tool
Start with the workflow, human decisions and intended benefit.
What changes when people can shape the systems they depend on? Explore the claims, cases and tensions across three days of conversation.
1:01Start with the workflow, human decisions and intended benefit.
A few connected clips. One question to follow. Choose a path through the conversations.
Seven short passages connect the summit’s questions: who decides, who benefits, and what turns a promise into practice?
Explore this path →02 · 5 CLIPS · 7:19 WATCH TIMEFollow the journey from choosing a useful problem to access, skills, continued support and institutional change.
Explore this path →03 · 5 CLIPS · 7:16 WATCH TIMECompare financial stakes, voting power, access to capital and the boundaries of cooperative membership.
Explore this path →04 · 4 CLIPS · 5:47 WATCH TIMEExplore what evidence can establish, where judgement remains necessary, and why incentives and infrastructure matter.
Explore this path →Who defines the problem, can use the service, and has the power to respond?
Explore the theme →02 / 27 SESSIONSSeparate membership, decision rights, purpose protection and the distribution of value.
Explore the theme →03 / 29 SESSIONSWhich rules, commitments and routes of challenge make participation consequential?
Explore the theme →04 / 29 SESSIONSWhat does a record establish, how was it assessed, and what remains uncertain?
Explore the theme →05 / 28 SESSIONSWhat can be shared, on whose terms, and who maintains it?
Explore the theme →06 / 30 SESSIONSHow do tools fit the workflow, context and continuing capacity of real organisations?
Explore the theme →07 / 26 SESSIONSWhich funding horizons, incentives and business models support sustained activity?
Explore the theme →08 / 24 SESSIONSHow do concentration, competition and practical alternatives shape room to act?
Explore the theme →09 / 20 SESSIONSHow do physical resources, local institutions and demand shape a fair transition?
Explore the theme →The event repeatedly names a missing step between producing an answer and changing a decision. Evidence may reveal conflicting priorities without resolving them.
Follow the evidence →Profit participation, control, secure use and durable purpose can be combined differently. No legal label establishes all four, and membership boundaries matter.
Follow the evidence →Interoperable records do not establish a commons. Maintenance, disclosure rules, liability and credible commitments determine whether sharing survives.
Follow the evidence →Standards and data can guide change, but processing capacity, feedstock, finance, incentives and who benefits remain material constraints. Sufficiency and end-use priorities challenge supply-only framings.
Follow the evidence →
1:43Sharetribe’s founders retained voting control before a later democratic transition.
2:09An API change exposed the recurring costs and legal responsibilities of shared data.
1:02A share of profits and influence over dominant firms are separate questions.
1:11Nuria Oliver explains why AI infrastructure depends on talent, opportunity and support for people whose work is changing.
1:24Bhaskar Chakravorti connects competition, institutions and public agency as starting points for changing who benefits from AI.
0:51Jens Lowitzsch explains how a renewable-energy ownership model uses trusteeship and future returns to include people without existing savings.
0:42MONDRAGON’s Ander Etxeberria Otadui describes training, transfers and supported retirement as responses to automation.
2:52A study distinguishes representation, votes and the power to stop a decision.