Better assurance requires incentives that reward finding and addressing problems.
More complete checking can expose failings while making a verifier commercially less attractive. Human judgement, consequences and shared expectations are necessary complements to automation.
An interpretation of the recorded discussion. The passages below have different roles: support, illustration, qualification, challenge, proposed mechanism or open question.
illustrates · DAY 3 · 21:13
Small pilot; inconsistent time figures, no false-positive or ground-truth assessment; outside formal audit report.
Likely speaker
Chuck RogersAmericas Director, Technical Consulting & Supply Chain Solutions · Bureau Veritas Consumer Products ServicesLinkedIn ↗ supports · DAY 3 · 22:39
Important market mechanism from practitioner experience, not a measured industry-wide effect.
Likely speaker
Chuck RogersAmericas Director, Technical Consulting & Supply Chain Solutions · Bureau Veritas Consumer Products ServicesLinkedIn ↗ proposes mechanism · DAY 3 · 23:22
Proposed control, not a validated deployed review system.
Likely speaker
Chuck RogersAmericas Director, Technical Consulting & Supply Chain Solutions · Bureau Veritas Consumer Products ServicesLinkedIn ↗ supports · DAY 3 · 38:02
Individual field account; no prevalence estimate or named investigation.
Likely speaker
Unidentified audience participant
Unidentified speaker
challenges · DAY 1 · 44:21
Raises a consequential possibility, not an observed outcome in this exchange.
Likely speaker
Unidentified speaker