Reported social conflict and disruption motivate a rights-based approach including fair negotiation and Indigenous consent.
Association in reported cases does not isolate causal effects.
Routes to question, report harm, obtain remedy or challenge decisions.
Routes to question, report harm, obtain remedy or challenge decisions.
Routine information sharing without challenge or redress is coordination.
The definition above is used to organise this collection. The passages below show how the idea appears in discussion.
Analyst applies. Reported social conflict and disruption motivate a rights-based approach including fair negotiation and Indigenous consent.
Association in reported cases does not isolate causal effects.
Qualifies the boundary. Routine information sharing without challenge or redress is coordination.
Participation does not establish equal authority.
No event-wide agreement is inferred from coding. Compare the attributed examples and boundaries; co-occurrence is not evidence of agreement.
Routine information sharing without challenge or redress is coordination.
Answerability needs to be distinguished from the practical routes people have to challenge a decision or obtain remedy.
Co-occurrence describes coding, not equivalence, causation or agreement.