Participants distinguish policy-bearing data exchange from an API that merely passes data.
Technical attachment does not itself demonstrate enforcement.
Entitlements and conditions governing access, use, control or benefits from data.
Entitlements and conditions governing access, use, control or benefits from data.
A technically possible transfer does not establish lawful or fair rights.
The definition above is used to organise this collection. The passages below show how the idea appears in discussion.
Analyst applies. Participants distinguish policy-bearing data exchange from an API that merely passes data.
Technical attachment does not itself demonstrate enforcement.
Qualifies the boundary. A technically possible transfer does not establish lawful or fair rights.
Performance and consistency not independently tested.
No event-wide agreement is inferred from coding. Compare the attributed examples and boundaries; co-occurrence is not evidence of agreement.
A technically possible transfer does not establish lawful or fair rights.
Permission to access or use data can enable action; effective agency also requires usable capabilities and opportunities.
Data entitlements may support bargaining, but favourable exchange terms depend on alternatives and leverage.
Portability can support leaving a provider; data permissions and practical ability to exit are distinct.
Co-occurrence describes coding, not equivalence, causation or agreement.